SPARTA 11 - CAUSE OBLIGATION DUTY
----Disclaimer----
This is open-source copyright free information only, and not legal advice.
The strength of everything written within this document is dependent on the number of people who understand and use it.
The more people who get off their knees and stand their ground, the stronger each remedy becomes.
“A new age has begun. An age of freedom for those who take it.”
CAUSE, OBLIGATION, DUTY
Download the fully-formatted .pdf file here:File:Cause Obligation Duty - PJ COD.pdf
When a claim is made upon most people, they make the mistake of taking the position of defence and argue over an obligation, which ultimately creates the duty to comply.
In almost all cases the cause of the obligation is either forgotten or not even considered; this is a fatal mistake.
However, before cause can even be considered, position and jurisdiction must be known.
Within both contract law and commerce, the position is known through a label or legal title, such as:
• UK citizen
• Resident
• Registered keeper
• Defendant
Jurisdiction is known through the source of the law.
• If you use your paperwork using your authority, it is your law, and therefore your jurisdiction.
• If you fill in a form issued by the state, you are operating in the state’s jurisdiction.
• If you quote a code, regulation or rule you created, the jurisdiction is yours.
• If you quote a code, regulation or rule created by the state, it is the state’s jurisdiction.
If both the position and jurisdiction cannot be determined, then the subject of the claim cannot be discussed and the claim must be withdrawn, or face a counterclaim backed by the sword.
If a position and jurisdiction are suggested then the nature of the cause must be provided to establish both position and jurisdiction before moving on to the obligation.
Cause
The cause that created the obligation can only be one of the following two reasons:
• Contract
• Trespass
Upon demand, the one making the claim must supply evidence of either cause, or the alleged obligation cannot be discussed.
When a summons to court is accepted, it should be for the purpose of hearing the claim asserted against you, thereby placing you in the position of respondent.
This means that you have not accepted any obligation, and are at court through special appearance solely to hear the claim and the evidence presented in support thereof.
Respondent: a position via special appearance to only hear the claim made against them and the evidence to support said claim.
A respondent does not defend their position; no legal argument is offered.
Note: you cannot defend a position that has not yet been determined or accepted.
Obligation
Before moving on to the obligation, the following conditions must be determined:
• The position of the one the claim has been made against.
• The jurisdiction in which the claim has been made.
• If the claim of obligation has been caused by either contract or trespass.
Once these conditions have been met and proof of claim determined, then duty may now be established.
If you are in court and have accepted both cause and obligation, then you have taken on the position of defendant, and have to defend why you are not duty bound to satisfy the obligation.
Defendant: a position via general appearance of one who has accepted both cause and obligation, and are now in court to defend why they have not carried out their duty.
A defendant has to defend their position; a legal argument is given.
Duty
Once cause and obligation have been established, duty refers to the moral or legal requirement to perform a specific action or uphold a certain commitment that satisfies the obligation.
This is usually done in some form of servitude, payment or even punishment such as imprisonment.
Note: within commerce a prison bond shall be created in your name and sold, whereby you are required to be locked up as collateral, until the bond is paid via your estate.
Duty is the action required to satisfy the obligation.
With these facts now known, an equation to depict this can now be put together:
Position : Label or Legal Title
Jurisdiction : Source of law
Cause : Contract or Tresspass (Respondent)
Obligation : Defended (Defendant)
Duty : Payment or Punishment
= PJ/C:O:D
Slavery vs Indentured Servitude
Although slavery and indentured servitude may involve the exploitation of workers, and are often considered the same, this is not true, as there are significant differences between them.
• One is contractual.
• The other is not.
Slavery
Slavery is a system in which people are treated as property, owned by another person and considered chattel, and in some cases even branded by their master’s mark.
They are forced to work against their will and were typically captured, or born into slavery, and are not free to leave their condition.
Slaves are often subjected to harsh treatment, including physical abuse, corporal and capital punishment, and are subject to the following:
• Lack of autonomy and freedom.
• Forced labour with no choice or compensation.
• No rights or protections as they cannot use their law.
• Involves physical punishment and even death.
Every slave has the right to their freedom, if they are willing to take it and fight for it.
Indentured Servitude
The word indentured comes from the Medieval Latin word indentare, which means “to furnish with teeth” and the Old French word endenter meaning “to notch”.
“To notch” refers to a 13th-century legal practice where contracts were written in duplicate on one parchment, then separated by a jagged-toothed line creating matching edges proving authenticity.
Indentured servitude is a system in which people would either sign a contract to work for a set period of time, or are obligated to work to repay some form of debt.
In the past, this would include an exchange for passage to a new country, food, shelter and clothing.
Although indentured servants are not owned by their employers or masters, they are contractual workers who are obligated to work for a fixed period of time.
The key characteristics of indentured servitude are as follows:
• Voluntary signing of a contract, or trespass requiring atonement.
• Fixed period of time stated within the contract.
• Servants or workers would receive some form of consideration.
• Servants are entitled to certain privileges within the contract and can even leave.
Most people today are living a life as an indentured servant without question, as they have the mind-set of a slave and are therefore unable to see their own freedom.
They do not realise or do not even care, that they are bound by contract that they accepted, which had no legitimacy to even begin with.
Before just wilfully accepting obligation, and fulfilling a duty, consider the cause first, or you are acting just like a slave and deserve your slavery.